Perspectives | Media

Male panels are normalizing inequality

By , - 20.10.2021

The composition of TV debates about the elections leaves many groups out.

Kosovo just completed its local elections on October 17. As on other occasions — national or local elections — TV debates were completely dominated by men. Moderators, analysts and even the candidates invited were all male, dominating the TV space throughout the campaign month.

We have monitored seven nation-wide TV shows for two weeks. As it turns out, the different TV studios invited 279 panelists to 66 prime time shows. Of those, only 37 were women.

For this monitoring, we defined panelists as guests on set, including both mayoral candidates and analysts, but not the show hosts, who are male in over 90% of the cases. The same phenomenon can be found in events, debates and round tables organized by state agencies, think tanks and non-governmental organizations.

Most of the analysts present on television are former party members or advisers to the country’s leaders. Independent researchers and university professors are much lower in number. In addition, there is no ethnic diversity, which is important to understand the ethnic tensions and divisions in the country.

What does this mean for how politics and important topics are understood by the public? First, unbalanced gender representation not only reflects the unequal character of a society, but also presents an unrealistic picture of the interests and opinions of that society in general. If all the TV space is filled with male analysts and politicians, it conveys to the general public — especially girls and women — the idea that politics, as a profession or as an activity, and political questions at large are not a field for women.

It is useless and somehow paradoxical to criticize the lack of female candidates when women are not even seen in television studios. The absence of women in politics is normalized. Since the TV space is homogeneous and dominated by men, they often employ a denigrating and sexist language towards women during debates. For example, during one episode of “Pressing,” an analyst twice said in a mocking way that Minister of Justice Albulena Haxhiu had left her position to give birth to her child.

Moreover, an unequal gender, and to some extent also geographical and ethnic representation — the analysts are mainly from certain municipalities and belong to one ethnicity — affects the reproduction of a particular culture that suppresses different thinking, hides daily problems, and makes offering political alternatives impossible. 

Since the current composition of the panelists is entirely made up of the socio-economic elite of Prishtina’s city center, the topics and problems addressed do not necessarily cover the viewer’s concerns. Therefore, the discourse and problematization of the topics in prime time debates is often neither familiar nor related to the daily issues of the residents of Prishtina or Kosovo in general, who are not part of that small elite group of urbanites from the capital.

The problem of gender, socio-geographical, and to some extent ethnic representation is the result of a lack of initiatives to address it as much as it is cultural.

Meanwhile, the content of the debates in prime time TV is choked with macro political topics. Apart from the occasional elections, the main topics of discussion are geopolitical relations, state and administrative borders, the dialogue in Brussels and the relations with the U.S. 

As a result, many real topics and concerns of citizens, women, girls, and suburban areas remain forgotten and ignored. Unequal gender, socio-geographical, and ethnic representation imposes certain themes and excludes many other topics that citizens find concerning. These range from deforestation in the region of Dukagjini or Podujeva as a result of construction to the lack of sidewalks and pedestrian spaces in entire neighborhoods in Mitrovica and Gjilan.

The problem of gender, socio-geographical, and to some extent ethnic representation is the result of a lack of initiative to address it as much as it is cultural. We have noted consistently that the problem of unbalanced representation also affects civil society. Although we have not been able to measure the level of balanced representation, we have seen many cases where civil society organizations organized events and conferences with only men. As in the case of the media, in civil society events, panels covering topics that are considered big are mainly dominated by men.

Therefore, as a first step, NGOs and think tanks should take the initiative and decide against organizing single-gender panels, and should make sure to provide equal socio-geographical and ethnic representation. Internal organizational culture and rules need to be changed where gender, socio-geographical, and ethnic equality in representation becomes the norm.

Participation is a privilege and should be used for emancipation, not for exclusion.

As a start, some principles should be established, each organization and institute should adhere to them and become an example so that gradually the media and other public institutions follow. These principles would in essence aim for public events, speakers and participants to reflect balanced gender, socio-geographical and ethnic participation and representation. 

A special mechanism could be established to monitor and evaluate balanced representation and create a new culture of categorizing and evaluating organizations according to the balanced representation criterion. Later, a similar system of principles would have to be pushed forward among the media and public institutions.

Finally, the problem of gender, socio-geographical, and ethnic representation can be addressed by analysts themselves, who should abstain from participating in single-gender events or shows and insist on equal representation. Participation is a privilege and should be used for emancipation, not for exclusion. Analysts and panelists should be aware that by participating in single-gender debates and panels without balanced representation they reproduce and sustain inequality.

Given that 21 municipalities will go into a runoff and that TV debates over local elections will continue, this might be an ideal opportunity to promote more balanced representation. Democracy should not be measured only by holding regular elections, but above all by balanced representation. Panelists cannot value democracy while taking part in practices that normalize inequality.

Feature Image: K2.0.